RE: Proposal for svnserve as a Windows service - 0.1

> Ok, the rough consensus appears to be:
>
> * Keep changes to svnserve minimal -- only add
> the support to start (and stop!) as a service.

I must have missed some messages. I thought I was the only one that
suggested this, and then it seemed like my response was met with universal
opposition that seemed more in favor with your proposal.

> The rest is really just nitpicking, and doesn't seem productive.

It seemed like you were getting pretty productive feedback, please do not
bail on the process so quickly.

> These diffs are modest enough (only a single --service arg is added to
> svnserve) that we can probably all agree to commit them. The service
> management part can come later, whether it's command line and/or GUI,
etc.

Even if your proposal is implemented in its entirety, it would make sense
to me to commit it in phases like this. Others might like to see the whole
proposal worked out first though.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 22 00:11:24 2006