[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: DeltaV conformance vs backward compatibility in fixing the issue 2151

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2006-02-20 22:36:25 CET

On 2/20/06, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> How would fixing the client (so that it explicitly fetches the live
> properties as required by RFC3253) be an incompatible change?

Having the server not return the full list of live properties would be
incompatible. Updating the client wouldn't be incompatible. But,
fetching just those two liveprops we need on every request would be
ridiculously inefficient and very likely not worth it. (We'd have to
do two PROPFINDs in order to get a single file because allprop doesn't
do what 2513 says any more. Ugh.)

However, this isn't a bug in SVN - mod_dav intentionally gives out all
liveprops on allprops. So, httpd would need to be fixed not
Subversion - as there's nothing Subversion can do. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 20 22:36:57 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.