Yves Bergeron wrote:
> julianfoad wrote:
> >Yes, but it's quite reasonable in practice. For one thing, it is only in
> >unusual situations that a file is modified but its time stamp is kept the same.
>
> Not so quite unusual. I've got through a lot of problems on Windows where the
> operation on a working copy are realised with batch files. In my situation,
> the modification of a file (that do not change it's size) was done
> immediately after a checkout.
> The working copy was not seeing the modification. I've got to generate
> a time gap over few seconds
> between my checkout and my modification if I wanted the working copy to flag
> the file as modified.
That's a separate bug. I think I saw recently that somebody was working on it.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 17 16:32:42 2006