Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Garrett Rooney]
>
>>If the script can be made to support the commonly used phrasing for
>>these things then go for it, it's so much better than being overly
>>anal about the exact wording people use.
>
>
> OTOH, don't go overboard. If you write some sort of natural language
> parser that accepts almost anything, two years from now people will
> look at the varied log messages and not realise that the format is
> machine-parsed at all. Then they'll outsmart the parser without even
> noticing it. The status quo *looks* machine-parsable, so it should
> make people think about that.
The way I see it, this gives us more incentive to get server side log
templates working... and installed on svn.collab.net.
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 10 11:06:25 2006