Re: [PATCH] Multiple RA layer initialization

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> On 2/7/06, Peter N. Lundblad <peter@famlundblad.se> wrote:
> > Hmmm, I don't think this will work with --enable-dso because the LINKS
> > macros won't be defined in that case. Can't you have extra #defines for
> > the two libraries that "conflict"? We're only allowing one to be built at
> > a time, right?
>
> The problem here is to try to allow DSOs while not doing Stupid Things(TM).
>
My point is that we always know what ra libraries we built, even if we use
--enable-dso, but anyway...

> How about the following patch instead? -- justin
>
Looks good. If it works with --enable-dso, +1. (I'm also fine with
looking for both libs; it is just one extra dlopen and we have version
checks to detect mismatches).

Best,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 7 20:45:13 2006