Re: Release policy question

> Re Greg's comments: I'm not 100% happy either with a method that can
> result in the first release in a series being something other than
> ".0". But I'm not 100% happy with the alternatives either, and at
> least we can always put something in the release notes explaining what
> happened, so those who bother to read the notes will not be confused.

It's hard to make a judgement call here, because we're weighing
"complex for svn developers" vs. "confusing for users".

Is the extra release-complexity imposed on ~15 active developers worth
the tradeoff of preventing user-confusion over tarball names? It
sounds like you think it's not worth it. I'm sort of thinking it is.
Hm.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 2 19:25:41 2006