[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn trunk r17762: FAIL (win32 ra_svn fsfs)

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2005-12-14 16:49:32 CET

On 12/14/05, D.J. Heap <djheap@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The first failure (hook) is due to a relative path in the hook -- the
> > svnserve process is not being started with a working directory of
> > where the hook is assuming it will be, I think. I'm not sure if the
> > hook should have an absolute path or if the svnserve process should be
> > started with a specific working directory? I don't think the tests
> > used to require that, but I'm not sure.
> >
> > I haven't looked at the other failures yet, but they may be related.
> >
> After taking a look, all the failures are due to the relative paths in
> the generated hook files. Are hooks supposed to be run with a
> specific working directory or should they not expect to have a known
> working directory?

I'm not really sure. Personally I always try to use absolute paths in
them though, and I don't recall any code that sets up a particular
working directory before running them.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 14 16:51:01 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.