Michael Sinz wrote:
> Sounds like you really are using xpm files for your source code.
> Maybe your build (makefile/etc) should then do the xpm-to-png
> "compile" process. Then you would store the xpm in your source
> control system just how you store the .c files and not the .o files
> (or the .java files and not the .class files, etc)
Not really. I am not the only person working on these .pngs,
and others use different tools, some of which do not even know
.xpm exists. So using .xpm as 'primary source' would make things
much more complicated in this situation as the others can't
simply 'svn export' any more without some post processing.
Andre'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 9 07:38:52 2005