Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
On 11/24/05, Branko Čibej <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The Windows zip file passes all 6 combinations; WinXP/NTFS/MSVC6.
> I also found a tiny bug in the Windows distro script that caused the
> binary packages to be generated without the translated .mo files. I've
> proposed the one-liner for inclusion in 1.3.0; the fix is trivial and
> doesn't touch the core code.
Looks like we have all the signatures we need for RC4, now. We have at
least three signatures for both the zip and the tarballs. So, then,
time to release?
David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james
Received on Tue Nov 29 21:51:33 2005
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev