[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Serf and Subversion

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2005-11-28 21:23:05 CET

--On November 28, 2005 3:14:18 PM -0500 David James <james@cs.toronto.edu>
wrote:

> If the new Serf-friendly protocols are developed on trunk, then they
> will be shipped with Subversion 1.4. Will we need to worry about
> binary compatibility for a library and protocol that is still in the
> early stages of development?

Given that we haven't even released 1.3 yet, judging by our past experience
of releasing a new minor roughly every 6 months, and the serf work should
be completed by April. So, I doubt that'll be a problem unless we rush out
1.4 sooner than that - which I haven't seen any discussion of yet.

If we do the work in trunk, my expectation would be that 1.4 would still
have neon by default with serf a configure-time option, but consider
switching for 1.5 if all goes well and it does have the advantages I think
it will. This follows what we did with fsfs and BDB. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 28 22:18:15 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.