On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 13:58 +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Given that I'm late with saying this, and you've already implemented a cache
> > for three specific values, may I persuade you to at least change the field so
> > that it doesn't look like a generic cache?
>
> Ah, this is a good point. It worried me that we wouldn't be able to add
> properties to the cache without a format bump once the code went live,
> and Julian points out a possible way to rectify this (by including
> absence as well as presence).
>
Yes, this is a problem with the current design. Do we expect to want to
change the list of properties often enough to justify the extra
overhead/complexity?
Thanks,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 28 16:54:51 2005