Re: Serf and Subversion was Re: DAV is complicated and slow?

On 27 Nov 2005 17:47:42 -0600, kfogel@collab.net <kfogel@collab.net> wrote:

> The naming thing is a bit wierd... after all, they're both DAV. We
> just didn't call the first one libsvn_ra_neon :-).

On the other hand, it's not like we had plans for more than one DAV
implementation at the time ;-)

Personally, I think as long as it's done as a compile time option and
the library is presented to the user via the current http:// and
https:// url schemes it doesn't really matter so much what we call the
library.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 28 02:20:28 2005