Re: DAV is complicated and slow?

On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 09:21 -0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > We already have the performance benefit of HTTP pipelining (at the
> > expense of giving up on generic HTTP caching), and ra_dav is still much
> > slower than ra_svn.
>
> We don't do HTTP pipelining in ra_dav/mod_dav_svn right now (Neon
> doesn't handle it); we just use custom reports.

Right, so we already have the performance benefit we *would* get from
HTTP pipelining.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 23 17:51:27 2005