[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Rolling rc3 - tarball issue

From: John Szakmeister <john_at_szakmeister.net>
Date: 2005-11-21 18:50:38 CET

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 11/21/05, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
>> Apparently, we need some official resolution on the issue of what to
>> name the tarballs, and whether to keep the double tarball (deps and
>> nodeps) regime.
>> I'm +1 on naming the "deps" tarball as regular, and make "nodeps" be the
>> suffixed one.
>> I'm +1 on dropping the nodeps tarball entirely.
> +1 on both of those options, leaning towards dropping the nodeps
> entirely because I just don't think it's worth the hassle and sticking
> with the current state of the union can't be that bad.
> Either way, we need to resolve this right now. This release has seen
> far too many delays as it is, and we need a tarball we can actually
> release to users.

I'm +1 on dropping the nodeps tarball entirely as well.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 21 19:05:15 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.