Rolling rc3 - tarball issue

Apparently, we need some official resolution on the issue of what to
name the tarballs, and whether to keep the double tarball (deps and
nodeps) regime.

I'm +1 on naming the "deps" tarball as regular, and make "nodeps" be the
suffixed one.

I'm +1 on dropping the nodeps tarball entirely.

apr, neon, etc are not ubiquitous enough that this is worth it. I know
nobody who builds from nodeps, even those who *do* have it installed
(which includes me).

It saves almost no significant amount of space, and if you really want
to compile with the system versions, it's easy enough to rm -rf the
dirs :)

So let's just get some resolution on this by voting, so we can roll the
release.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 21 18:53:01 2005