On 11/18/05, Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
> David James <james@cs.toronto.edu> writes:
>
> > On 11/17/05, Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> >> Since the patch is getting kind of big, I'd like to check this in on a
> >> branch if nobody has a problem with that, it's getting kind of tedious
> >> to keep saving my work via svn diff ;-)
> > +1. Please create a branch. Thanks for your work!
>
> I think it should go on the trunk, unless Garrett really wants a
> branch.
I had suggested a branch simply because it's not done yet, the API is
still evolving, and there's no ra_dav support yet. On the other hand,
it's not like we're about to roll a release, and this is totally new
functionality that isn't likely to break anything else, so committing
to trunk probably wouldn't hurt anything.
Anyone else have a strong opinion on trunk versus branch? Personally,
I'm still leaning slightly towards a branch for now, but I could be
convinced to go either way.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 18 19:05:25 2005