Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 11/15/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> All tests pass with no-op svn_wc__prep_file_for_replacement and
>>>> changed svn_io_file_rename. What do you think about this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Please don't even consider ripping that code out before you're 100% sure
>>> it's not needed (any more). I certainly didn't make those changes for
>>> fun. They were needed at the time.
>>>
>> Oh, I know. I wasn't talking about ripping *all* af it, just the part
>> where it retains the read-only bit on the destination.
>>
>> If I consider that:
>> - svn:needs-lock was developed on *nix (linux, probably)
>> - in *nix it's possible to overwrite a read-only file
>> - unix retains the attributes on the file being renamed
>> - on Windows a file cannot be renamed if it or its rename-target is read-only
>>
> Interesting note: Windows *allow* rename read-only files, but fail if
> target is read-only. Could anybody fix me? Brane, what do you think?
>
Yikes. It looks like this is actually the case. If that's true, we'd
really only have to (optionally) make the destination read-write, and
really rip out the rest of the code...
Wait a sec, let me try that. (I still can't remember why I looked at the
target's read-only-ness... possibly it had something to do with the
files in .svn, too, although I've no idea what...)
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 15 23:17:33 2005