[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: r17214, JavaHL thread local storeage and reentrant calls

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2005-11-15 10:39:20 CET

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 03:40:33PM -0800, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 11/14/05, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:
> > In which case, I'll wait until later tomorrow to see if anyone has any
> > objections, then merge it into the 1.3 branch. As I understand it,
> > a change exclusively under bindings (like this one) only requires a
> > single +1 to merge.
> Actually, you need one more vote to merge, someone with commit access
> to that part of the tree needs to vote at least +0, which would leave
> you with the required one +1 and one +0 vote.

Oops, yes, you're right. I didn't read the requirements properly.

> If I have a chance I'll
> try to go over all this stuff once more later today, so I can at least
> give you that ;-)



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 15 10:42:10 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.