Re: question about private header

On 11/9/05, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@red-bean.com> wrote:

> It seems sloppy. Why wouldn't we be following our own
> conventions/rules about svn_foo_ and svn_foo__ ? Is this some special
> exception? In other words, if I were to commit a fix for this right
> now (making svn_txdelta_compose_windows() into a public API), would
> someone object? Or is there some secret mainteance-nightmare reason
> *not* to do so? It's not clear to me if this is an intentional thing,
> or just a bit of sloppiness nobody's bothered to clean up.

ENOCLUE, but it's been that way for a very long time, IIRC.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 10 06:09:09 2005