Re: Missing tags: 1.3.0-rc1, 1.3.0-rc2

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:44:51AM -0800, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Why ever not? The tag is a permanent record of what was in that
> tarball, information that is both useful to have and not dependent on
> the entire set of conditions that must be met for a tarball to be
> signed. In other words, that rc1 was DOA before getting the required
> signatures should in no way imply that we don't want to tag rc1 --
> that code *is* rc1, whether or not rc1 is the final release.
>

I seem to remember a similar problem with 1.2.2, and, indeed, there is
no 1.2.2 tag in the repository.

Again, there probably should be.

Regards,
Malcolm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 8 18:17:46 2005