Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Dear Branko,
>
>>> Yes, if we are going to do this, we should *definitely* take the
>>> opportunity to choose a better name.
>
>> Before going on with this patch, I'd like to see some real discussion
>> about why we want this in svn proper at all. What's wrong with
>> leaving the functionality in svnversion? I've not seen a single good
>> reason.
>
> I'm still waiting for a good reason to have it a separate command.
> *ALL* other user accesses are managed with "svn" and its subcommands.
I initially objected because of our then-current policy of keeping the
command set small.
In the meantime, we started discussing the extended-command-set idea, so
I withdraw my objection. :)
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 3 23:34:41 2005