[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Missing APR_BUFFERED flag on file open?

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-11-03 12:11:20 CET

On 11/3/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> It looks like we use a lot of non-buffered file i/o:
> Seaching for '(APR_READ or APR_WRITE) and not APR_BUFFERED' returns 31
> files, whereas '(APR_READ or APR_WRITE) and APR_BUFFERED' only returns
> 7.
> Is it intentional that we haven't specified APR_BUFFERED so often?
> I don't mind committing the addition of APR_BUFFERED to every
> file-open call, but just want to makes sure it was not intentional
> before doing so.

BTW: you can see the result for both searches at:


(2): http://hix.nu/subversion/lxr/search?filestring=&string=%28APR_READ+or+APR_WRITE%29+and+APR_BUFFERED


Received on Thu Nov 3 12:12:34 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.