Re: Possible Problem with JavaHL in 1.3.0 RC2

Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com> writes:

> Looking at the history of the code, however, wouldn't really explain what
> has changed between 1.2 and 1.3 that would cause a new problem. This code
> was all present in 1.2 and earlier.

This is low level initialisation code, perhaps the higher level code
now calls it more often so provoking a race? Or perhaps the higher
level code used to have some bottleneck that effectively serialised
the initialisation and that has now been removed? I don't do Java at
all, I'm just guessing.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org