Philip Martin <email@example.com> wrote on 11/02/2005 11:42:48 AM:
> Mark Phippard <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Stack: [0xaff57000,0xaffd8000), sp=0xaffd61e8, free space=508k
> > Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code,
> > C [libsvnjavahl-1.so.0.0.0+0xf2b1]
> > C [libsvnjavahl-1.so.0.0.0+0x10afc]
> > C [libsvnjavahl-1.so.0.0.0+0x107c1]
> $ echo _ZN7JNIUtil21isJavaExceptionThrownEv | c++filt
> $ echo _ZN7Notify28onNotifyEPK15svn_wc_notify_tP10apr_pool_t | c++filt
> Notify2::onNotify(svn_wc_notify_t const*, apr_pool_t*)
> Perhaps getEnv is returning NULL?
> The static bool stuff in JNIUtil::JNIInit looks a bit dodgy.
I have done some additional crash scenarios (commit, checkout) and they
produce the same strack trace.
As I am not a C programmer I cannot really analyze the code, but I would
think you are right. Perhaps it has something to do with the
SVN_ASP_DOT_NET_HACK code that was added to the initialization. However,
none of that code should be compiled in the Linux version so it would seem
Also, I am still at a loss to explain what is different about Subclipse
using this and the test suite, although I imagine it has something to do
with why it works for some repositories and not others. That being said,
I hacked up a JUnit test that checks out that URL I have before and it
works fine. So maybe it is something to do with how the library is
initialized when it is run from Subclipse?
I can post an installable version of Subclipse for anyone that wants to
test this. You need this version because it has the required 1.3 changes
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Wed Nov 2 19:22:09 2005