[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Path canonicalization assertion failure triggered by add_dir_recursively()

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-10-28 23:07:12 CEST

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Marc Sherman wrote:

> Philip Martin wrote:
> >
> >Subeclipse can call svn_path_basename before calling
> >svn_wc_is_adm_dir, is there some reason that it's better for
> >Subversion to do it? On the whole I tend to favour the existing
> >interface.
> My understanding of that thread was that the Subclipse folks just wanted
> the docstring updated to assert that the name parameter must be a
> basename already.

Marc, looks like you're right -- Mark Phippard had already followed up
saying as much.


Daniel Rall
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 28 23:08:04 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.