Re: Path canonicalization assertion failure triggered by add_dir_recursively()

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Marc Sherman wrote:

> Philip Martin wrote:
> >
> >Subeclipse can call svn_path_basename before calling
> >svn_wc_is_adm_dir, is there some reason that it's better for
> >Subversion to do it? On the whole I tend to favour the existing
> >interface.
>
> My understanding of that thread was that the Subclipse folks just wanted
> the docstring updated to assert that the name parameter must be a
> basename already.

Marc, looks like you're right -- Mark Phippard had already followed up
saying as much.
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-10/0994.shtml

Thanks!

-- 
Daniel Rall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org