Re: New -c option to diff/merge (r17054)

On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:19:43AM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Looks like the parsing for the new --change option should probably trap
> > negative revision numbers in the same way as it traps revision 0:
> >
> Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
> Well, since it's there, should I implement Karl's suggestion of making
> it transform -2 into 2:1?
>

Unsure; we can always add it in as an option later.

I think that it might need further discussion, especially in light of
Julian's proposal to extend -c to log, etc. (What would 'svn log -c
-2' mean, for example?).

Regards,
Malcolm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 27 14:31:36 2005