Bruce DeVisser wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 04:54:20PM -0400, David James wrote:
>
>
>>The "-c" or "--change" option is much more clear. Using the "-c"
>>option, you can easily cherrypick changes from trunk to merge to a
>>branch. Here's an example use case, from the STATUS file for 1.3.x.
>>
>>* r16930, r16975, r16989, r16990.
>> Actually fix the cause of perl bindings segfault by allocating for
>> ... (yada yada yada)
>>
>>To merge these four changes, I can type
>> svn merge -c16930 ../trunk .
>> svn merge -c16975 ../trunk .
>> svn merge -c16989 ../trunk .
>> svn merge -c16990 ../trunk .
>>
>>In future, I'd like to see the "-c" syntax extended, so that you can
>>merge multiple revisions. Then you could just type:
>> svn merge -c16930,16975,16989,16990 ../trunk
>>
>>
>
>
>
What would be the default behavior if the revision on the path specified
did not exist, i.e. the path is a branch that did not exist at 16930?
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 26 12:39:55 2005