Re: RFC: an idea for making 'svn list' faster

On 10/23/05, egoots <egoots@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is svn_ra_get_dir2( ) intended to return various combinations of the
> above fields by OR'ing them together? If so, shouldnt the constant
> field values have unique bits set? For example, shouldnt they be
> something like:
>
> #define SVN_DIRENT_FIELD_KIND = 0x00001; // binary 0000 0001
> #define SVN_DIRENT_FIELD_SIZE = 0x00002; // binary 0000 0010
> #define SVN_DIRENT_FIELD_HAS_PROPS = 0X00004; // binary 0000 0100
> #define SVN_DIRENT_FIELD_CREATED_REV = 0X00008; // binary 0000 1000
> #define SVN_DIRENT_FIELD_TIME = 0X00010; // binary 0001 0000
> #define SVN_DIRENT_FIELD_LAST_AUTHOR = 0X00020; // binary 0010 0000

You're correct, I screwed up the values in the initial email.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 24 08:16:30 2005