On 10/23/05, David James <james82@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/23/05, zhakov@tigris.org <zhakov@tigris.org> wrote:
> > > Author: zhakov
> > > Date: Sun Oct 23 08:28:56 2005
> > > New Revision: 16940
> > >
> > > Added:
> > > branches/wc-propcaching/TODO
> > > - copied unchanged from r15510, /branches/wc-propcaching/TODO
> > > Modified:
> > > branches/wc-propcaching/subversion/libsvn_wc/lock.c
> > > branches/wc-propcaching/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h
> > >
> > > Log:
> > > Merge r15503-15510 (all changes) from the old branch.
> > >
==============================================================================
> > > --- branches/wc-propcaching/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h (original)
> > > +++ branches/wc-propcaching/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h Sun Oct 23 08:28:56 2005
> > > @@ -60,10 +60,15 @@
> > > * The change from 4 to 5 was the addition of support for replacing files
> > > * with history.
> > > *
> > > + * The change from 5 to 6 was the introduction of caching of property
> > > + * modification state and certain properties in the entries file.
> > > + *
> > > * Please document any further format changes here.
> > > */
> > > -#define SVN_WC__VERSION 5
> > > +#define SVN_WC__VERSION 6
> > trunk has already been bumped wrt 1.3.x; another bump is not required
> > iff you merge the branch back before 1.4.
> If the wc-propcaching branch is merged to trunk without a WC format
> bump, would working copies created by our current trunk client still
> work? What would happen?
Erik, I have same question. Also what is extra pay incrementing WC
format by two between releases?
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on Sun Oct 23 21:40:57 2005