[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 1.3.0 RC1

From: Kouhei Sutou <kou_at_cozmixng.org>
Date: 2005-10-23 04:14:23 CEST


In <435AE883.2070809@calixo.net>
  "Re: Subversion 1.3.0 RC1" on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:33:55 +0200,
  David Anderson <david.anderson@calixo.net> wrote:

> David James has been busy fixing some of this, so here is the current
> status of our SWIG bindings, tested on the two test architectures I
> had (x86_32 amd and x86_64 amd64):
> * Ruby builds on both. Three tests fail on both architectures (the
> same tests fail). I've mailed Kouhei to ask him to take a look at
> this and call whether this is a blocker or not.

I found the problem is caused from r16903.

Ruby bindings need to add

  %import apr.h


  %apply unsigned int { apr_uint32_t };

to apr.swg.

Is the latter case is better solution?



Index: subversion/bindings/swig/include/apr.swg
--- subversion/bindings/swig/include/apr.swg (revision 16922)
+++ subversion/bindings/swig/include/apr.swg (working copy)
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@
+%apply unsigned int { apr_uint32_t };
 /* ----------------------------------------------------------------------- */

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 23 04:15:11 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.