On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Philip Martin wrote:
> "Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> writes:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Greg Hudson wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 22:20 +0200, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> >
> >> An alternative--though a rather more complicated one--would be to open a
> >> pipe (set FD_CLOEXEC in the child; dunno if you can do that with APR)
> >> and marshal the error information through it back to the parent, where
> >> it could be returned to the caller programmatically.
> >>
> > I guess this might work as well, it just seems to be overkill. But if you
> > or others feel strongly about it, I could give it a try.
>
> Any reason not to use the errfile parameter? That's where the caller
> expects to see error output.
>
What do you mean? In the revision at hand, errors between fork and exec
are written to the childs stderr, which is the same as the errfile.
Best,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 23 00:50:47 2005