[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 16855 and our secret neighbors

From: David Anderson <david.anderson_at_calixo.net>
Date: 2005-10-21 00:58:00 CEST

Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Thus, my inclination in response to these concerns is that if and
> when this change merges to the 1.3 branch, is to simply put in a
> large release note in a developer section, give a heads up at RC time
> to all the people we know about who might be affected, and call that
> that.

I'm +1 on this. The change our secret neighbors will have to make is
very simple, and while it causes a minor annoyance at modification time,
it does solve a major annoyance of the people with large working
copies. And our non-secret neighbors will get a warning ping during the
RC soak, which should give them plenty time to adapt if they so wish.

> I also believe we should fully document the WC format in 1.4, so
> people reimplementing it aren't hit by our little implementation
> niggles.

+1 to ban the niggles.

- Dave.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 21 01:10:32 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.