Re: Seeking JavaHL developers for RC

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Mark Phippard wrote:

> Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> wrote on 10/20/2005 12:47:49 PM:
>
> > Though it was the JUnit tests which you modified (which themselves have
> no JNI
> > dependency), it still seems like it might be much cleaner to rely on the
> > return value of svn_wc_get_adm_dir(). What do you think?
>
> The JavaHL tests use JavaHL (and thus JNI) so if this method were exposed
> via JavaHL it could certainly use it. And I agree it would be cleaner.

I'm putting something together...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 20 19:39:05 2005