I never got any response to this message so I'll resend it to the
list. I'm sorry if this isn't actual bug (although it looks like
one), but I'm just following the rules and trying to get dev-list
opinion on this before submitting the potential bug into the issue
tracker.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Nikita Zhuk <nikita@nikitazhuk.net>
> Date: September 22, 2005 11.34.45 GMT+03:00
> To: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: svn status --show-updates doesn't display status of
> deleted subdirectories
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Looks like svn status --show-updates [-u] has a bug which causes
> status of deleted subdirectories to be missing from the output. The
> following test case was made at Mac OS X 10.4.2 with local
> subversion repository. SVN version number is 1.2.3. I have
> confirmed that the same bug occurs with SVN 1.2.3 at Mac OS X
> Server 10.3.9.
>
> Numbers in #() are references to comments at the end of this message.
>
> $ ls -la
> .
> ..
> .svn
> dirA
>
> $ svn rm dirA/
> D dirA/dirB/foo
> D dirA/dirB
> D dirA
>
> $ svn st dirA
> D dirA
> D dirA/dirB
> D dirA/dirB/foo
>
> $ svn st -u dirA # ( 1)
> D 4 dirA/dirB
> D 4 dirA/dirB/foo
> D 4 dirA
> Status against revision: 4
>
> $ svn st dirA/dirB
> D dirA/dirB
> D dirA/dirB/foo
>
> $ svn st -u dirA/dirB # (2)
> Status against revision: 4
>
> $ cd dirA
> $ svn st .
> D .
> D dirB
> D dirB/foo
>
> $ svn st -u . # (3)
> D 4 .
> Status against revision: 4
>
>
> #(1): Here svn st -u works correctly
> #(2): Here svn st -u doesn't list anything although it should list
> both dirA/dirB and dirA/dirB/foo
> #(3): Here svn st -u lists only '.', but it should've list also
> dirB and dirB/foo.
>
>
> If this will be confirmed as a bug, I'm ready to submit it to issue
> tracker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 18 14:55:17 2005