On 10/16/05, Max Bowsher <maxb@ukf.net> wrote:
> djames@tigris.org wrote:
> > Author: djames
> > Date: Sun Oct 16 09:26:40 2005
> > New Revision: 16753
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h
> > trunk/subversion/include/svn_wc.h
> > trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/constructors.c
> > trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/util.c
> >
> > Log:
> > Revert r16375, r16741, and r16752, in preparation for reapplying as a
> > clean
> > commit. This simplifies the review process for the 1.3.x branch.
>
> Let's not make a habit of this in the general case.
>
> In the instance I did this, I did it *only* because I was completely
> throwing away one approach to tackling the problem, and replacing it with an
> unrelated change.
>
> If I understand correctly, r16375, r16741, and r16752 were an incremental
> development of a single design.
Ah, I see. Thanks for explaining this! I'll avoid this approach in future.
Cheers,
David
--
David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james
Received on Sun Oct 16 19:22:55 2005