On 10/16/05, Ivan Zhakov <chemodax@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/14/05, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@red-bean.com> wrote:
> > I just committed a first draft of the 1.3.0 CHANGES entry, so at least
> > our rc1 tarball is no longer blocking on that.
> It seems that you forget about r16029 (mod_authz_svn should only
> return HTTP_FORBIDDEN). I consider it is important fix.
The CHANGES file is never 100% complete, it represents an "edited"
version of changes, sort of a summary/highlights thing. I
personally didn't think it was quite important enough to list as a
separate item, because (1) there was no bug filed on it, (2) nobody's
ever noticed or complained about it before, since the birth of
mod_authz_svn, and (3) it doesn't harm users or make the software
unusable. It seems more like a theoretical correction. Generally, I
think the CHANGES file should list bugs that either have nasty
negative effects on users, or are bugs that might make someone want to
upgrade.
But, if you feel strongly about it, go ahead and add it the list. :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 16 17:30:13 2005