Re: More on possible problem with Neon 0.25.0 [was Re: 1.3.0 RC1 ready to be rolled]
From: John Peacock <jpeacock_at_rowman.com>
Date: 2005-10-14 19:01:35 CEST
Michael Brouwer wrote:
That code is already there and has been for ages (via blame):
> 15892 dionisos NEON_ALLOWED_LIST="0.24.7 0.25.0 0.25.1 0.25.2 0.25.3"
and earlier:
> 15051 kfogel NEON_ALLOWED_LIST="0.24.7 0.25.0"
and before that:
> 12869 maxb NEON_WANTED_REGEX=0.24.7
We've been using a hardcoded list of acceptable Neons for a _really_
John
-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Fri Oct 14 19:02:18 2005 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.