Re: More on possible problem with Neon 0.25.0 [was Re: 1.3.0 RC1 ready to be rolled]

John Peacock wrote:

> I'd rather have a "--no-neon-version-check" so that someone has to do
> something proactive, rather than just relying on warnings. Unless you
> make the configure script interactive (not going to be met with a lot
> of support), it would best to error out if 0.25.0 was found, but give
> people a way around it should they so choose.

Sounds good to me, failures are large enough warnings :-). It is indeed
better to force proactiveness in the case of possible breakage.

If there are no objections to this, can someone who knows the build
scripts integrate that behaviour and nominate the change for 1.3.x ?

- Dave.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 14 15:34:38 2005