kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>Don't worry, serious security flaws will always be handled.
>
>The text we use when we deprecate is like this:
>
> The Subversion 1.0.x line is no longer supported. This doesn't
> mean that your 1.0 installation is doomed; if it works well and is
> all you need, that's fine. "No longer supported" just means we've
> stopped accepting bug reports against 1.0.x versions, and will not
> make any more 1.0.x bugfix releases (except perhaps for a critical
> security or data-loss bug.)
>
>That's from the 1.2 release notes.
>
>
Sorry for joining the discussion late, but if that's what you're wanting
to convey then I think "deprecate" is too strong a word:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=deprecate
1. To express disapproval of; deplore.
2. To belittle; depreciate.
Perhaps "end-of-life" or something similar would be a better term? When
I hear "deprecate", I think it means you're saying there's a serious
problem with it and it shouldn't be used.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 12 15:17:44 2005