Re: Proposal for $Revision$ keyword amendment
From: John Peacock <jpeacock_at_rowman.com>
Date: 2005-10-11 21:10:47 CEST
Greg Hudson wrote:
So it does. ;-) That was a little contrived, but this flow is more
$ vi some/file.c
and which will indeed lead to other-file.c having a differing revision
So, there would be two pieces to implementing this keyword:
a) Add the keyword itself (trivial, actually);
As you pointed out, implementing b) would also also be the fix for the
John
-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Tue Oct 11 21:11:25 2005 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.