[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Relative behaviours of authz in mod_authz_svn and svnserve

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-10-10 22:08:08 CEST

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 21:15 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > I agree with Max: 1 for now, 2 later. I don't think there's enough
> > time to get the fix into 1.3.0, especially with all the bindings stuff
> > going on, and it's clearly not a showstopper for anyone, since there's
> > a reasonably clean workaround.
> Doesn't choosing option 1 close the door on option 2 later? If we use
> the last path component as a repository identifier in 1.3, we can't
> switch to using a root-relative path without creating a compatibility
> problem.

Well, it's not a matter of "choosing" 1. The behavior which 1
proposes to document is already present in Subversion. Documenting
that behavior isn't an endorsement of bugginess, if we decide that the
behavior is indeed buggy. In fact, documentation is an opportunity to
*clarify* that we consider it a bug and that we might change it in the

So either the door is shut on 2 already or it's not. Choosing 1 will
not shut it further, as far as I can see.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 10 23:19:20 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.