[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: subversion log conventions (from svnlook log)

From: patrick boenzli <boenzlip_at_orxonox.ethz.ch>
Date: 2005-10-10 23:01:54 CEST

On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 14:48 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> >
> > Is there somewhere a documentation on how subversion writes these logs?
> A copy that happens in rN is never from rN, but from some revision
> before N. That is, the "copyfrom source revision" must be less than
> N. So there shouldn't be a problem here, even if your parser works in
> the most natural (but still correct) way.
> The copyfrom source revision is present in 'svn log -v' output and
> 'svn log --xml'. Is it not available in 'svnlook log'?
Thanks Karl, you just showed me a big mistake I made in my
implementation: I realy deleted the directory internaly instead of just
marking it as deleted (which I assume is how SVN makes it).

Back on the road again :D

Patrick Boenzli             |The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
OrxonoX 3D Shooter          |-- From a real employee performance evaluation.
boenzlip_at_orxonox.ethz.ch    |http://www.orxonox.ethz.ch  

Received on Mon Oct 10 23:10:20 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.