Daniel Rall wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2005, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
>
>> On 2005-10-04 14:24:26 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
>>> Is mod_{dav,authz}_svn:
>>>
>>> EITHER (a) a client of the subversion libraries like any other, hence a
>>> mod_dav_svn should work with libsvn_* libraries of the same, _or any
>>> greater_ 1.x version - e.g. 1.2.x mod_dav_svn with 1.3.x libsvn_* libs.
>>>
>>> OR (b) an integral part of the core subversion code, and thus should
>>> only
>>> be used as part of a matched set of equal-versioned components.
>>
>> iirc it was b. there were some debian bug about it. and the team replied
>> the API rules only applies to external APIS. not to the internal ones.
>
> (a) sounds like way more trouble than it's worth.
Ummm.... What on earth?
I asked expecting to receive a quick confirmation: "(a), obviously".
Now I've taken the time to think it through, I realize that it absolutely
has to be (a) without question, because that is a natural consequence of our
compatibility rules, unless we do something dastardly like use supposedly
library-private APIs in mod_dav_svn.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 9 17:46:51 2005