Re: Suggestion: preventing inode crowding with FSFS

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> The new layout cannot be on by default until 2.0.

I'm not advocating that we implement a new layout, but if we do, why
would it have to wait till 2.0 to be the default? I thought such a
change could happen in a new minor release. From hacking.html:

   Working copy and repository formats are backward- and
   forward-compatible for all patch releases in the same minor series.
   They are forward-compatible for all minor releases in the same
   major series; however, a minor release is allowed to make a working
   copy or repository that doesn't work with previous minor releases,
   where "make" could mean "upgrade" as well as "create".

Is there some other concern I'm missing?

-Karl

-- 
www.collab.net  <>  CollabNet  |  Distributed Development On Demand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org