Re: Has anyone done a static mod_dav_svn build *ever*?

"Max Bowsher" <maxb@ukf.net> writes:
> I was reviewing old issues in the tracker and realized something...
>
> IIUC, building a static apache module has been broken for over 3 years
> now (!)
> Am I right, or has anyone actually done a static apache build recently?
>
> If I have not misinterpreted the configure code, and this truly is the
> case, then I think we should consider ripping out the residual code
> supporting this option.

What exactly is broken about static mod_dav_svn builds? Is it the
sort of thing that enterprising people might have worked around? If
so, we might want to check on users@ to see if anyone's getting use
out of static builds, before ripping out what support we do have.

Thoughts?

-Karl

-- 
www.collab.net  <>  CollabNet  |  Distributed Development On Demand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org