Philip Martin wrote:
>Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
>
>
>
>>Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I didn't notice any performance hits when running the tests -- not
>>>that I'd expect any in that context.
>>>
>>>
>>On my Linux box using the generic CAS implementation in apr_atomic.c
>>on a non-NPTL 2.4 kernel, rough measurements indicate that running
>>'svn status' on a Subversion working copy is about 3% slower.
>>
>>
>
>I don't have a Windows box to test on, but I hacked the Unix client
>and it seems to work. Anyone object to the following implementation?
>
>
I had an almost identical patch sitting in my WC. I thoight I'd
committed it, but it turns out I only ran the tests and forgot to
commit. Done in r16333.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 29 00:22:12 2005