erymuzuan wrote:
> May interupt on a few things or two, xml output is really useful ,
> especially for those who doing automated build, in our case
> combination of NAnt and CruiseControl. Having to parse string output
> is never been pretty. Well I know for the fact for those writing
> something on top of subversion , they are better off with subversion C
> library or language binding for Java or phython. but for those quick
> and dirty batch script, build script is not always possibble.
>
> The second thing is to replace dtd with xsd, there's much better tool
> support and it's lot more xpath friendly. I would like volunteer to
> work on the xsd schema with those who look at this as a good way to
> go. may be write patch for the implementation too.
How is XSD more "xpath" friendly? And *if* DTD isn't going to be
sufficient (why exactly?), why not RelaxNG?
Best regards, Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 28 09:20:25 2005