On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Paul Burba wrote:
> Here is the latest patch for improved out of date info when using svn
> status -u.
>
> The background on all of this can be found here:
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-08/0257.shtml
...
> [[[
> Provide more complete server-side information about out of date items when
> using svn status with -u option.
>
> * subversion/include/svn_wc.h
> (svn_wc_status2_t): Add new fields to store the most recent revision,
> author, and commit date for an out of date item, as well as its url
> and node type.
This portion of the log should enumerate the field names. ^
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c
> include svn_time.h
> (dir_baton, file_baton): Add new fields mirroring those in
> svn_wc_status2_t.
> (assemble_status): Initialize new svn_wc_status2_t members.
> (tweak_statushash): Changed arguments, all callers changed.
> Copy out of date info into svn_wc_status2_t struct.
> (make_dir_baton, make_file_baton): Initialize new dir_baton and
> file_baton members respectively.
> (change_dir_prop, change_file_prop): Temporarily store out of
> date info in dir_baton and file_baton respectively.
Regarding the "ood_" prefix, I was wondering if the "repos_" prefix already
in use for the lock tokens, text status, and prop status wouldn't be a more
appropriate prefix. Are those fields also only set when the editor has
changes which are new to the working copy to report?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 28 06:59:16 2005