[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Branching for 1.3.

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2005-09-23 20:34:11 CEST

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> 3. Similar story with Issue #443 (post-commit hook error output lost):
> The client-side API changes will make it into 1.3, but the bug
> itself will not be fixed in 1.3. Please correct me if wrong.
>
Yes, I think it is too much to get done before 1.3. And since we need to
change the potocols (at least ra_svn), we can't do it before 1.4.

> 4. The r15287 situation :-). r15287 allowed sending of multiple
> locks at once over ra_svn and ra_dav. But, it had a number of
> problems, which Peter Lundblad enumerated in his review. Since
> it introduces a protocol change, we need to either a) fix those
> problems right away, or b) yank r15287 for now, and reinstate it
> after branching 1.3, to fix at our leisure. Much as I would
> like to fix it (especially since I approved the original patch),
> I will not have time to do this before branching 1.3. If no one
> else will either, then we should temporarily revert the change.
> Thoughts? (Thoughts from Peter Lundblad especially desired...)
>
I had forgotten about that when Madan reminded us with his mail, which was
very good. I hoped to get it fixed today, but now I've had some glasses
of wine, so... And since it is a preformance improvement and not a bug
fix, I thinks it is best to just revert it for 1.3 and hope to get it done
early in the 1.4 cycle.

Good evening;)
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 23 20:35:39 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.