Re: Branching for 1.3.

kfogel@collab.net writes:

> "Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> writes:
> > HOw about the remaining blame optimizations (dberlin?)? I'm talking about
> > the reversal of the revision fetching.
>
> I recall hearing that DannyB had done some tests and decided that the
> speedup wouldn't be enough to justify the extra complexity introduced
> by this change, especially after #1970 got done.
>
> DannyB will, I hope, correct me if I'm misremembering...

Adding DannyB to the To: line, just in case...

I, too, am interested in the relationship between the blame speedups
and issue #1970. Besides the obvious improvement of the initial
get-locations call that precedes the real annotation work, I don't see
how #1970's fix is of use to the blame code at all.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org